Legal Opinion

Gibson & DeJournette v. Graham

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 19, 1919No. 10783PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Complaint; from city coart of Floyd coanty—Judge Nunnally. Jane 5, 1919.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Gibson & DeJournette sued S. L. Graham upon his written assumption of a debt duo by King & Graham, a corporation; the writing relied upon as the basis of the suit being as follows: “Rome, Ga., June 20, 1918. Messrs. Gibson & DeJournette, Rome, Ga. Gentlemen: In reference to the bill of King & Graham, following my conversation with your Mr. DeJournette, beg to advise I will be personally responsible for same and see it is paid by July 15th. Very truly, [Signed] S. L. Graham.” At the conclusion of the evidence introduced in behalf of the plaintiff the court directed a verdict in favor of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pearce & Co. v. Stone Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Fields v. BurlingtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schroeder v. Hunter Douglas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  2. Graham v. Nash Loan Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  3. Little v. WhitingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API