Russell v. Scarborough
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.
Appellees, who are heirs at law of F. M. Woodstock, deceased, filed their hill in the chancery court of Piar rison county against appellants to reform a deed from Roderick Seal to F. M. Woodstock executed more than twenty years before the bill was filed. The cause was tried on bill, answer, and proofs, and a decree was rendered granting the relief prayed for in part. From that decree appellants prosecute this appeal.
The deed from Roderick Seal to Fl M. Woodstock contained a void description of the land intended to be conveyed. The evidence amply showed that both parties to the deed intended…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Strickland v. KirkMississippi Supreme Court · 1875
- Taylor v. Lowenstein. & Bro.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1874
- Breland v. ParkerMississippi Supreme Court · 1928
- Money v. RickettsMississippi Supreme Court · 1884
- A. J. Lyon & Co. v. CarrMississippi Supreme Court · 1928
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bank of Mississippi v. HollingsworthMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
- Marion Mortgate Co. v. GrennanSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Beauchamp v. McLauchlinMississippi Supreme Court · 1946
- Florida Gas Exploration Co. v. SearcyMississippi Supreme Court · 1980
- Sunnybrook Children's Home, Inc. v. DahlemMississippi Supreme Court · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.