Codwise v. Gelston
Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors
THESE causes came before this court on two appeals from the court of chancery. The latter was an appeal from an order of tiie 12th of September, 1310, and the first was a cross appeal from a decree of that court of the 23d of September, 1809. Both appeals were argued at the same time, and considered to* gether by the court.
1Opinion of the CourtYates, J.
The first question arising on the appeal of D Gelston, is, whether the judgment in his favour against Comfort Sands could at all be affected by the previous conveyance to Henry Sands 1 and if not,
Whether the subsequent acts of Gelston have operated either-as an extinguishment of the debt, or as a destruction of the lien he had in virtue of that judgment?
On an appeal from the court of chancery, in relation to the conveyance of C. Sands to Henry Sands, the decision of this court is sufficiently explicit to prevent a misconstruction of their decree. By it the conveyance of the real estate…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Freedman's Savings & Trust Co. v. EarleSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Purdy v. DoyleNew York Court of Chancery · 1829
- In re Estes & CarterDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1880
- Henderson v. HerrodMississippi Supreme Court · 1852
- Jackson v. HolbrookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.