Legal Opinion

Harlow v. Worcester Consolidated Street Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 15, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.

The plaintiff’s intestate, Ernest F. Harlow, was in the employ of a company operating motor trucks between Boston and Worcester. On the afternoon of December 31, 1922, a five-ton truck, about twenty-one feet long, nine and one half feet high, and painted a bright red color (upon which the plaintiff’s intestate was employed as a helper), while moving from Boston to Worcester in the town of Northborough and proceeding to ascend a hill at a grade of about six per cent, skidded, backed down and stopped with the left rear wheel of the truck on the car rail, the truck facing toward Worcester. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Duggan v. Bay State Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  2. Mercier v. Union Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  3. Dube v. Keogh Storage Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  4. Burns v. Oliver Whyte Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  5. Breen v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Loyle v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  2. Maderios v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  3. McCoy v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  4. Bean v. Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API