Legal Opinion

Navarro v. Lamana

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 21, 1915No. 475PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

Navarro and Lamana were partners doing business under the firm name of Star Bottling Works, in which business appellant owned five-eighths interest, and appellee three-eighths interest. Appellee instituted this suit, seeking a dissolution of the partnership and accounting. An auditor was appointed, who made his report to the court. Exceptions to portions thereof were filed by appellant. .Pending a hearing on the exceptions, the parties settled by agreement all their partnership affairs as to the assets and physical properties of the business, leaving only for settlement the matter of the cash…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Franklin Life Insurance v. VilleneuveCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
  2. Rotan v. Maedgen & KennonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
  3. Turner v. GrobeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
  4. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. LucasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Taormina v. CulicchiaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  2. Dial v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Cook v. PeacockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  4. Wilson v. MolineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  5. Newman v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API