Legal Opinion · Concurrence

People v. Polk

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided June 14, 2019No. E069641Published

1Concurrence

RAPHAEL, J., Concurring.

*349*357Is there any quantity of a controlled substance that is too small to be a "usable quantity" under California law?

Our answer in today's opinion, at least in my view, is no. I join the opinion but write to explain this answer. Under our reading of existing law, the "usable quantity" element-counter to the ordinary meaning of those words-does not actually depend on the quantity of the drug in the defendant's possession. In this case, any measurable quantity of methamphetamine would suffice to support defendant's conviction; we hold that a small quantity of that drug…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. RhodeIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. People v. PalaschakCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  5. State v. CheramieArizona Supreme Court · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API