People v. Polk
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Concurrence
RAPHAEL, J., Concurring.
*349*357Is there any quantity of a controlled substance that is too small to be a "usable quantity" under California law?
Our answer in today's opinion, at least in my view, is no. I join the opinion but write to explain this answer. Under our reading of existing law, the "usable quantity" element-counter to the ordinary meaning of those words-does not actually depend on the quantity of the drug in the defendant's possession. In this case, any measurable quantity of methamphetamine would suffice to support defendant's conviction; we hold that a small quantity of that drug…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. RhodeIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. PalaschakCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
- State v. CheramieArizona Supreme Court · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.