Legal Opinion

Marta v. McCarthy

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 31, 2021No. Civil Action No. 2020-1020Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) WAYNE P. MARTA , ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 20-cv-1020 (APM) ) JOHN E. WHITLEY, Acting Secretary of the ) Army, ) ) Defendant. 1 ) _________________________________________ ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Lieutenant Colonel Wayne P. Marta attempted to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits to his dependents after completing his active duty service. His request was rejected on the ground that such a transfer had to be made while on active duty. Marta then petitioned the Army…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Camreta v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. James Madison Limited, by Norman F. Hecht, Sr., Assignee v. Eugene A. Ludwig, Comptroller of the CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API