Legal Opinion

State v. . Hinnant

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1897PublishedCited by 1 opinion

INDICTMENT for carrying a concealed weapon, tried before Graham, J., and a jury, at November Term, 1896, of Wilson Superior Court. The defendant was convicted and appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Faieoloth, O. J.:

The defendant was indicted for carrying a concealed weapon. He admitted that he purchased a pistol at a store and put it in his pocket and carried it home.

The only question sent to the jury was the intent with which the pistol was carried. Plis Honor charged the jury that they were the sole judges of the intent, and that if defendant put the pistol in his pocket only to carry it home he was not guilty, but if they believed from the evidence that he did so with inteat to conceal it while carrying it, he would be guilty; also, that they must not consider the evidence of what…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. . McManusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  2. State v. . DixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  3. State v. . LillySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  4. State v. . PigfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. ReamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API