Legal Opinion

Headen v. Jackson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 16, 1961No. 598PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNS, J.

The testatrix, Nancy E. Bencini, executed her will in 1948. She gave her daughter, Robah B. Tatum, one fifth of her estate which consisted entirely of personalty. The will did not contain a residuary clause. Robah B. Tatum died in June, 1959, leaving Hamilton B. Tatum, the appellant, whom she adopted in 1924 as her only child. The testatrix died in March, 1960. Does the legacy given to Robah B. Tatum go to the defendant, Hamilton B. Tatum, or does it lapse? The court held that the legacy lapsed and the adopted child *159does not share in the estate. The question here involves the property rights…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilson v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Bradford v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Bennett v. CainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Crumpton v. MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Thomas v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. In Re Baker's EstateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  4. Crumpton v. CrumptonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Parker v. BlaineDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API