Legal Opinion

Damian v. Hernon

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 23, 1931No. Appeal 184PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baedrige, J.,

The plaintiff brought this action in assumpsit against the defendant to recover the sum of $300, with interest from May 7, 1930, as a penalty for illegal fees charged and collected in an action tried before the defendant as a justice of the peace.

The learned court below held that although the fees charged and received were concededly illegal and excessive, the plaintiff failed to give the preliminary notice to the defendant of his intention to proceed against him, as required by the Act of March 21, 1772, 1 Smith Laws 364 (2d Purdon, 13th Ed. 2162). Under that statute…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Noonan v. PardeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  2. Shaffer's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  3. Menner v. President of the Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  4. Apple v. RamboSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1849
  5. Barnett v. CainSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Phico Insurance v. Presbyterian Medical Services Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Raab v. Keystone InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Closed Circuit Corp. of America v. Jerrold Electronics Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Wykle v. Valley Fidelity Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
  5. Raab v. Keystone InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API