Conrad v. Marlar
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
DAVISON, Justice.
This is an appeal by Eugene T. Conrad and Naydene J. Conrad, husband and wife (defendants below), from a judgment on jury verdict in favor of M. O. Marlar (plaintiff below) in an action for personal judgment and foreclosure of a lien for labor performed and material furnished in painting the defendants’ homestead residence. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the lower court.
Plaintiff’s petition was in the usual, and proper form. There was no controversy as to the property and residence being the homestead of the defendants.
Plaintiff testified he made an oral…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Parkhill Truck Company v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Saak v. HicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Newsom v. MedisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Armstrong v. Independent Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Adams v. SwanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Broadway Clinic v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- St. John Medical Center, Inc. v. Innis (In Re Innis)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1995
- Broadway Clinic v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Cosgrove v. StewartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963