Whitlow v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Jackson, Chief Justice.
■ [Defendant and Henry Bailey were indicted for burglary.
Defendant was tried separately^ and was convicted. He moved for a new trial, on the following among other grounds:
(1.) Because the verdict was contrary to law 'and evidence. ■ “ “■ ’ •
(2.) Because the, court permitted the wife of Henry Bailey to testify as a witness for the state, Bailey and defendant béing- jointly-indicted, but defendant being tried separately.
(3.) Because the court charged as follow's : “ In the next place, inquire whether the defendant is the guilty párty or not. Did he break and enter the…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Rivers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Fuller v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Smith v. HazlehurstSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.