Legal Opinion

Whitlow v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 17, 1885PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jackson, Chief Justice.

■ [Defendant and Henry Bailey were indicted for burglary.

Defendant was tried separately^ and was convicted. He moved for a new trial, on the following among other grounds:

(1.) Because the verdict was contrary to law 'and evidence. ■ “ “■ ’ •

(2.) Because the, court permitted the wife of Henry Bailey to testify as a witness for the state, Bailey and defendant béing- jointly-indicted, but defendant being tried separately.

(3.) Because the court charged as follow's : “ In the next place, inquire whether the defendant is the guilty párty or not. Did he break and enter the…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rivers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  3. Fuller v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  4. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  5. Smith v. HazlehurstSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API