Legal Opinion

MacManus v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 3, 1942No. 9110PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONS, Circuit Judge.

The single question presented for decision is whether for tax purposes the petitioner was a trustee in four separate and independent trusts originally set up by his father, Theodore F. MacManus, or whether, by the several mutations subsequent to the original creation of the trusts, they had become merged into a single trust with multiple beneficiaries. The question is important because if there is but a single trust, as the Commissioner of Internal; Revenue ruled, and the Board of Tax Appeals found, a substantial additional tax is payable. If there are four trusts as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tracy v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
  2. US Trust Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Buhl v. KavanaghCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  4. Huntington Nat. Bank v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
  5. McCrory v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McHarg v. FitzpatrickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
  2. Hemphill v. AukampWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Boyce v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1961
  4. Hale, Former Collector of Internal Revenue v. Dominion Nat. Bank Henslee, Collector of Internal Revenue v. Dominion Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951
  5. MacMANUS'ESTATE v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API