Legal Opinion

Jones v. Quantrell

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1886PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from District Court, Alturas County. Tbe court erred in overruling appellant’s motion to quash service of summons on him, and in sustaining respondent’s motion to quash appellant’s motion, and for this purpose appellant could appear specially. {Deidesheimer v. Brown, 8 Cal. 340; Gray v. Hawes, 8 Cal. 569; Lyman v. Milton, 44 Cal. 631; Kent v. West, 50 Cal. 185; Linden Gravel Min.

Read the full summary

APPEAL from District Court, Alturas County. Tbe court erred in overruling appellant’s motion to quash service of summons on him, and in sustaining respondent’s motion to quash appellant’s motion, and for this purpose appellant could appear specially. {Deidesheimer v. Brown, 8 Cal. 340; Gray v. Hawes, 8 Cal. 569; Lyman v. Milton, 44 Cal. 631; Kent v. West, 50 Cal. 185; Linden Gravel Min. Go. v. Sheplar, 53 Cal. 245; Lindler v. Flemming, 47 Cal. 614; Elbridge v. Kay, 45 Cal. 49; Lung Chung v. N. P. B. B. Co. (TJ. S. Dist. Ct. Or.), 2 West Coast Rep. 88; Atchison, etc. By. Co. v. Niohols…

1Opinion of the CourtHays, C. J.

This was an action brought to foreclose a mortgage given by defendants to respondent on property situate in Alturas county. The complaint, among other things, sets out that the defendants gave their joint notes to respondent for $850, with interest thereon. To secure the payment.of said notes they made, executed, and delivered their joint mortgage on property therein described. It appears that this action to foreclose the mortgage was duly commenced, and defendant Quantrell appeared in the court below. Defendant Ward, through his attorney, appeared specially, and moved the court to vacate the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Senter v. De BernalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. People ex rel. Love v. CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Adam S. Mills and Others, in Error v. William G. Brown and Others, and the County of St. Clair, in ErrorSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  4. Luco v. Commercial BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Titiman v. Alamance Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Diamond Bank v. Van MeterIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Doust v. Rocky Mountain Bell Telephone Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Aulbach v. DahlerIdaho Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Lydon v. GodardIdaho Supreme Court · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API