Stewart v. Snohomish County PUD No. 1
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR
This matter was tried to the Court from May 8, 2017 to May 12, 2017. The claims presented were whether Defendant failed to reasonably accommodate Plaintiffs disability, failed to afford her protected medical leave, and impermissibly fired her because of her disability. After bench trial and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 52(a), the Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law1:
I.FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Defendant Snohomish Public Utilities District No. 1 (the PUD) is a municipal corporation in Snohomish County.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Carolyn Humphrey v. Memorial Hospitals AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Xin Liu v. Amway Corporation Does 1-50 InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Richard McAlindin v. County of San Diego Rudolph Tamayo Edward Baker Gabriel Rodriguez Does, One Through 50, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Riehl v. Foodmaker, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- Riehl v. Foodmaker, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Alaa Elkharwily v. Franciscan Health SystemCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Brzycki v. University of WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021
- Cynthia Stewart v. Snohomish County Pud No. 1Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Dries v. Sprinklr IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
- Kniffen v. East Wenatchee Water DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.