Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Leach v. Gunnarson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1980No. CA 13659, SC 26754Published

1Concurrence

PETERSON, J.,

specially concurring.

Looking at the law from the various states, it appears that there is a split of authority whether conditions which are visible, open and notorious constitute a breach of the covenant against encumbrances. Tiffany states:1

"* * * In some cases the fact that the grantee had notice, actual or constructive, of a highway upon the land, has been regarded as taking such incumbrance out of the operation of the covenant. In a few cases the fact that the existence of an incumbrance in favor of an individual was apparent upon an inspection of the land, and that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Huyck v. . AndrewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Winn v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Ford v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Wetherby v. GriswoldOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Corbett v. WrennOregon Supreme Court · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API