People v. Lundell
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Molea, J.), rendered March 28, 2000, convicting him of driving while intoxicated (two counts), upon a-jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
*570Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the evidence adduced at trial was legally insufficient to support his conviction of driving while intoxicated is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Legagneux, 263 AD2d 517 [1999]) and, in any event, without merit. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. MertzNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. GangaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. KaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. MiloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. MeneganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. KrutAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. BargerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. VelasquezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. EastAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.