Legal Opinion

Gainfort v. 229 Raritan Avenue Corp.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 27, 1941PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

On September 30th, 1937, plaintiff fell on the sidewalk fronting the building designated as No. 229 Baritan Avenue, in Highland Park; and she sued to recover damages for the ensuing injury on the hypothesis that the causative agent was a nuisance created or suffered by the defendant landowner’s predecessor in title in the subsidence oí a section of the concrete surface between one and a half and two inches below the normal pavement level due to basic structural insufficiency. The jury found for the plaintiff; and defendant appeals from the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Leahan v. CochranMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  2. Fuller v. AndrewMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Longi v. Raymond-Commerce Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  2. Snidman v. DorfmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  3. Orlik v. DeAlmeidaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  4. Halloway v. GoldenbergNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  5. Sowers Ex Rel. Sowers v. Forsyth Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API