Legal Opinion

Rochester Lumber Co. v. Dygert

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRodenbeck, J.

The judgment of the defendant Warren was docketed after the mortgage which is sought to be foreclosed, and before the note was indorsed by the plaintiff, for whose benefit the mortgage was given. There is no allegation in the answer that the plaintiff had notice of the hen of the judgment, and, under the circumstances of this case, there would be no priority of the lien of the judgment. Superiority of the lien of the judgment can be predicated only upon the asumption that the indorsement by the plaintiff was optional under the language of the mortgage, and that the plaintiff had actual notice…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ackerman v. . HunsickerNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Hyman v. . HauffNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Shea v. CampbellNew York Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of HarrisNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API