Legal Opinion

State v. Propotnik

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 25, 1984No. C9-84-104PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

Appellant Larry Propotnik appeals his conviction for burglary of an unoccupied building in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.58, subd. 2(3) (1982). He claims he was denied a fair trial, should not have been given the presumptive sentence of 41 months in prison, and claims several other issues merit relief. We disagree and affirm.

FACTS

On January 1, 1983 at about 1:20 a.m., University of Minnesota students Philip Littman, Yaron Berman and Daniel Geretz were returning to the B’nai B’rith Hillel House in Minneapolis. When they arrived, Littman encountered a man downstairs…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. KindemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. State v. CaronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  4. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. State v. BouwmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. PackardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  2. State v. GoebelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API