Legal Opinion

Conrad Gorospe Shirley Gorospe v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 21, 2006No. 04-73277PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION

THOMAS, Circuit Judge.

OPINION

The appeal presents the question of whether the United States Tax Court has plenary jurisdiction to hear all appeals from collection due process (“CDP”) proceedings before the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”). We reaffirm the principle that the Tax Court's jurisdiction over appeals from CDP determinations is limited to issues over which the Tax Court would have had jurisdiction to consider the underlying tax liability.

I

When a taxpayer fails to pay his federal taxes, after the IRS demands payment, the amount due becomes a “lien in favor of the United…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Freytag v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Commissioner v. McCoySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. James M. Robinette v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Alvarado v. Cajun Operating Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Keller Tank Services II, Inc. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  3. Estate of Robert C. Duncan v. CIRCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  4. Los Coyotes Band of Cahuilla & Cupeño Indians v. JewellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  5. Wagenknecht v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API