Legal Opinion

People v. Skrynski

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1977PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

There are two significant issues. The first attacks, on due process constitutional grounds, the use of nonlawyer town and village Justices. The second involves the alleged lack of opportunity by defendant to be advised of his right to counsel and the availability of such counsel.

On the first due process issue the State Constitution provides for the continuance of town and village courts as they existed in the past (NY Const, art VI, § 17, subd a). The State Constitution also provides the Legislature with the power, subject to some limitations, to change the jurisdiction of town and village…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. North v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Weiss v. INCORPORATED VILLAGE OF SAG HARBORDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. DessusSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Hansel v. Town Court of SpringfieldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  5. Hansel v. Town Court For The Town Of SpringfieldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API