Legal Opinion
Crossman Cadillac, Inc. v. Board of Assessors
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 3, 1978PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding pursuant to article 7 of the Real Property Tax Law, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated April 21, 1977, which, after a hearing, inter alia, granted petitioner’s motion for summary judgment and adjudged that appellants’ assessment of petitioner-respondent’s telephone equipment was erroneous, illegal and void. Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Margett, J. P., Rabin and Titone, JJ., concur; Mollen, J., dissents and votes to reverse the judgment and confirm the assessments in question, with the following memorandum: I believe that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re New York Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Matter of Crystal v. City of Syracuse, Dep't of AssessmentNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Crystal v. City of Syracuse, Department of AssessmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Matter of New York Telephone Company v. FerrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- People ex rel. Holmes Electric Protective Co. v. ChambersNew York Supreme Court · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- MATTER OF QUOTRON SYS., INC. v. IrizarryNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- American Cablevision of Rochester, Inc. v. JacobsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Supreme Burglar Alarm Corp. v. KaplanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979