Legal Opinion

Franklin v. Rathmann

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1932Published

1Opinion of the CourtHinkley, J.

This is an application by each .of the above-named petitioners for a peremptory order of mandamus reinstating him in his position as engineer and bridge operator in the service of the city of Buffalo. Upon the argument of the motions it was conceded that there was no dispute of any material allegation in either of the petitions calling for alternative orders of mandamus. The sole issue of these motions is a question of law identical in each case.

The undisputed facts are as follows: Petitioner James J. Fox is an honorably-discharged soldier and veteran, having served in the navy of the United…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Davison v. . WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Matter of Devins v. . SayerNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. People Ex Rel. De Vito v. . SayerNew York Court of Appeals · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API