Legal Opinion

Goldman v. Seidell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 23, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition and mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent Justice Harry E. Seidell to render a decision on the petitioner’s motion to remove the receiver in an action entitled Steven L. Goldman v Dennis L. Bernardini, et al., pending in the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, under Suffolk County Index No. 5741/94.

Upon the petition and papers filed in support of the proceeding, and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

Ordered that the branch of the petition which seeks relief in *548the nature of prohibition is dismissed as…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Miller v. LanziseraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Weaver v. VaughanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Gitzis v. Baily-SchiffmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. Gitzis v. Baily-SchiffmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API