State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Appellant’s claim of abuse of discretion cites the last sentence of the first paragraph óf R. C. 4123.-57(B), which reads: “No application for subsequent percentage-determinations on the same claim for injury or occupational disease shall be accepted for review by the district hearing officer unless supported by substantial evidence of new and changed circumstances developing since the time of the hearing on the original or last determination.”
Appellant contends that medical opinion which differs only on the basis of increase in numerical' percentage from that- previously awarded is not…
2Cited by8 opinions
- State ex rel. Prinkey v. Emerine's Towing, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024
- State ex rel. Parrish v. Walter Randolph & Carl FritschiOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
- State ex rel. Prinkey v. Emerine's Towing, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2024
- State ex rel. Rocktenn Co. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State ex rel. Casper v. McGraw Edison ServiceOhio Supreme Court · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.