Legal Opinion

Richards v. Hollis

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 28, 1893No. 794PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Grant Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, C. J.

William Hollis departed this life testate on the 15th of April, 1891, leaving appellee, who was his second wife, without children, surviving him as widow. By the terms of his will said William Hollis devised to appellee five hundred dollars out of his personal property, and also one-third of his real estate during her natural life. After making bequests of specific amounts to several of his children and grandchildren, he devised the residue of his estate, personal and real, to his children and grandchildren. Aside from the real estate, the personal estate, which came into the hands of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shipman v. KeysIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Shafer v. ShaferIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pierce v. PierceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Whisnand v. FeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. Blake v. BlakeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. In re Estate of RingelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API