Oxford v. Martenez
District Court, D. New Mexico
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO DANIEL MARK OXFORD, Petitioner, v. No. 19-cv-172 JCH-CG FNU MARTENEZ, Warden, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Respondents. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Petitioner Daniel Mark Oxford’s
28 U.S.C. § 2254
Habeas Corpus Petition (Doc. 1) (Petition). Oxford challenges his state rape convictions based on, inter alia, ineffective assistance of counsel. The Court previously directed Oxford to show cause why his § 2254 Petition should not be dismissed as untimely. Because Oxford cannot…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- McQuiggin v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Lawrence v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Day v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Clay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.