Legal Opinion

Oxford v. Martenez

District Court, D. New Mexico

Decided July 29, 2020No. 2:19-cv-00172Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO DANIEL MARK OXFORD, Petitioner, v. No. 19-cv-172 JCH-CG FNU MARTENEZ, Warden, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Respondents. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Petitioner Daniel Mark Oxford’s

28 U.S.C. § 2254

Habeas Corpus Petition (Doc. 1) (Petition). Oxford challenges his state rape convictions based on, inter alia, ineffective assistance of counsel. The Court previously directed Oxford to show cause why his § 2254 Petition should not be dismissed as untimely. Because Oxford cannot…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. McQuiggin v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Lawrence v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Day v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Clay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API