Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Andrews v. McPartland

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 22, 2010No. 5D08-3415Published

1ConcurrenceCohen, J.

Were I writing on a clean slate, 1 would reverse. The issue is whether a plaintiffs undifferentiated proposal for settlement that is served on two defendants, one of whose liability is undisputedly vicarious, is valid.

The facts are straightforward. George Andrews was injured in an automobile accident with Sandra McPartland. Mrs. McPartland was driving a vehicle she jointly owned with her husband, Thomas. Thomas’s liability was purely vicarious, based solely on his joint ownership of the vehicle. Andrews served an undifferentiated proposal for settlement, pursuant to section 768.79, Florida…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lamb v. MatetzschkSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  2. DAB Constructors, Inc. v. OliverDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API