Legal Opinion

Dunnette v. Henry L. Doherty & Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1930No. Docket No. 36, Calendar No. 35,194PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

Plaintiff in her own right and as assignee of her sister, whose funds she handled, brought this suit to recover from defendants money by her entrusted to Walter F. Plumb, a licensed salesman of the defendant Doherty & Company, to be invested by the company in certain securities. The funds were misappropriated by Plumb. The Fidelity & Deposit Company was on the Doherty & Company bond, ■which was filed with the Michigan securities commission in accordance with the so-called blue sky law. Act No. 220, Pub. Acts 1923. Defendants pleaded the general issue and gave notice of special defenses. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. People's National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Timmerman v. BultmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Stobbelaar v. BergMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Timmerman v. Henry L. Doherty & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Zoski v. GainesMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Kearns v. Michigan Iron & Coke Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Nierman v. White's Motor Parts, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Stone v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Green v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API