Legal Opinion

Jure v. Ballatin

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 15, 1853PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the District Court, Second District, Parish of St. Bernard, Rousseau, J.

1Opinion of the CourtRost, J.

This is a rule taken by the plaintiff upon the sheriff to show cause why he should not pay over the balance of the money made upon the execution in this case and remaining in his hands.

The sheriff claims, and the District Court allowed him, the amount of that balance, say $341, for keeping the live stock sequestered in the suit during thirteen days and for the taxed costs to which he is entitled.

The plaintiff has appealed from the order discharging the rule.

We have perused the record with great care without discovering evidence upon which the judgment can be sustained. The stock was kept in a…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Crusel v. BrooksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API