Legal Opinion
Bailey v. Metropolitan Paving Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 9, 1968No. 42200PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Justice.
There is involved here for review an order of the State Industrial Court, sitting en banc, affirming an order of the trial judge denying the claim of the petitioner, claimant below, for compensation against the respondents. Parties will be referred to as they appeared before the State Industrial Court.
Claimant in his Form 3, filed on January 28, 1966, as amended by his evidence, alleges that on or about November 24, 1965, while working as a heavy equipment operator for respondent Metropolitan Paving Company on a project at Will Rogers Field, Oklahoma County, he inhaled lime…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Howland v. Douglas Aircraft CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc. v. HighfillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- McMurtrey v. American Ass'n of Petroleum GeologistsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Flint Construction Company v. WoodsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Sunray Mid-Continent Oil Company v. HooverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pearl v. Associated Milk Producers, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Kinser v. Western Sands, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- Hills v. H. J. Jeffries Truck LineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968