McQueen v. New
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from special term, New York county. Action by John McQueen, receiver of the Powerville Felt-Roofing Company, Limited, against Tobias New and others, for conversion. From an interlocutory judgment sustaining a demurrer to certain defenses set up in the answer, defendant New appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Brunt, P. J.
This action was brought by the plaintiff, as receiver of the Powerville Felt-Roofing Company, against the defendants, to recover damages for the conversion of certain property alleged to have been wrongfully taken, carried away, and converted by the defendants. The complaint alleges that on the 21st of December, 1892, by a final judgment, the property of the Powerville Felt-Roofing Company, was sequestrated, and one Josiah Jewitt was appointed permanent receiver of said company, and of its property and effects, of every kind and nature whatsoever and wheresoever situated, and that on the 24th…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Brunswick Corporation v. Howell W. Clements, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Olympic Lanes, Inc.,defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
- Empire Dairy Feed Co. v. Chatham National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Mansfield v. Yates-American Machine Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929
- McQueen v. NewNew York Supreme Court · 1895