Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. McCoy

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 19, 2005No. COA04-209Published

1DissentGeer, Judge

Rule 2 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure provides that “[t]o prevent manifest injustice to a party, or to expedite decision in the public interest, either court of the appellate division may, except as otherwise expressly provided by these rules, suspend or vary the requirements or provisions of any of these rules in a case pending before it upon application of a party or upon its own initiative . ...” I can conceive of no greater example of “manifest injustice” than to allow a man to be imprisoned based only on unsworn statements, including statements not made on the record. Adding to the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Viar v. North Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
  3. Groppi v. LeslieSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Carolina Power & Light Co. v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  5. Russell Judas Nelson v. C. C. Peyton, Superintendent of the Virginia State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API