Legal Opinion

People v. Geant

New York County Courts

Decided June 20, 1990Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

John V. Vaughn, J.

Defendant has orally moved to dismiss count 2 of the indictment (criminal solicitation in the fifth degree) upon the ground that the Grand Jury may not indict for a violation.

The cases relied upon by the defendant in support of the proposition that a Grand Jury may not indict for a violation (People v Du Pont, 28 AD2d 1135; People v Clairborne, 36 AD2d 500, revd 29 NY2d 950) dealt with the prior Code of Criminal Procedure and are not controlling. CPL 200.20 provides in part: "1. An indictment must charge at least one crime and may, in addition, charge in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. ClairborneNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. People v. ClairborneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API