Legal Opinion

Kratzenstein v. Lehman

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided December 15, 1896PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by defendant Lehman from order denying his. motion to vacate judgment and enjoin sheriff from selling, on execution, his interest under an endowment and life insurance policy.

1Opinion of the Court

Van Wyck, Ch. J.

The action was for goods sold and delivered by-plaintiff to defendants, who resided in Louisiana, and an attachment was granted because of the nonresidence of defendants and issued to the sheriff, who thereunder, by service of a copy thereof on the Manhattan Life Insui’ance Company of this city, levied upon the defendant Lehman’s interest under a certain life insurance and endowment policy, issued in. 1889 by such company to defendant Lehman. The action was duly commenced by substituted service without the state, and the attachment was granted and levy thereunder by sendee of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mechanics' & Traders' Bank of Jersey City v. DakinNew York Court of Appeals · 1873

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Amberg v. . Manhattan Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. In re BonvillainDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1916
  3. Amberg v. Manhattan Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API