In Re High Voltage Engineering Corp.
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOAN N. FEENEY, Bankruptcy Judge. I. INTRODUCTION
The contested matter before the Court presents the issue of whether this Court should grant a motion to vacate final, non-appealable orders it entered allowing compensation to certain professionals employed in the Debtors’ prior Chapter 11 cases. The professionals whose fee awards have been challenged have raised a number of defenses which, if accepted, will compel denial of the motion and termination of the contested matter.
On November 9, 2005, prior to the entry of the order confirming his First Amended Plan of Liquidation under…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Pinter v. DahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Massachusetts School of Law at Andover, Inc. v. American Bar Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Bateman Eichler, Hill Richards, Inc. v. BernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors v. R.F. Lafferty & Co., Inc. Cogen Sklar, L.L.PCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Anne Anderson v. Cryovac, Inc., Anne Anderson v. Beatrice Foods Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gray v. Evercore Restructuring, L.L.C. (In Re High Voltage Engineering Corp.)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- In Re High Voltage Engineering Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
- Gray v. Evercore Restructuring, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008