Legal Opinion
American Cyanamid Co. v. S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 30, 1989No. Civ. A. 89-1858PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BISSELL, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is plaintiff American Cyanamid Company’s (American Cyanamid) motion for a preliminary injunction restraining defendant S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. (S.C. Johnson) from using the designation MAX or any other designation which allegedly infringes on plaintiff’s MAXFORCE trademark for insecticides. In this Opinion, the Court will not address all factual and legal issues raised in the extensive papers and arguments of the parties, only those material to its decision. Rest assured, however, that no issue not specifically addressed here has been…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Abercrombie & Fitch Company v. Hunting World, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Amstar Corporation v. Domino's Pizza, Inc. And Atlanta Pizza, Inc., Pizza Enterprises, Inc. And Pizza Services, Inc., Hanna Creative Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- John H. Harland Company, Cross-Appellant v. Clarke Checks, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Scott Paper Company, a Corporation v. Scott's Liquid Gold, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Homeowners Group, Inc. v. Home Marketing Specialists, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Genovese Drug Stores, Inc. v. TGC Stores, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- Acxiom Corp. v. Axiom, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1998
- Taj Mahal Enterprises, Ltd. v. TrumpDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
- Woodroast Systems, Inc. v. Restaurants Unlimited, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.