Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hamlet v. Hamlet

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 31, 1989No. 88-1849Published

1DissentSharp, Judge

The majority holds that the trial court made a finding that there was an equitable distribution of marital assets, and that we must accept this finding as neither side challenges it. However, equitable distribution may encompass more than a distribution of assets. It includes a combination of such remedies as lump sum alimony, permanent periodic alimony, and exclusive use of property.

In the case sub judice, the finding that assets were equitably distributed was contained in a judgment that also awarded the wife permanent, periodic alimony of $4,000.00 per month. Because of the alimony…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barrs v. BarrsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  2. Clemson v. ClemsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  3. Miceli v. MiceliDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. Penmont Enterprises, Inc. v. DysartDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  5. Thompson v. ThompsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API