Board v. B & B VENDING COMPANY
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
REYNOLDS, Justice.
Plaintiff’s suit for damages for defendant’s failure to renew plaintiff’s sublease was summarily terminated when the trial court sustained the interposed defense that plaintiff did not timely exercise his option for renewal. Concluding that the defense was not established as a matter of law, we reverse and remand.
Defendant B & B Vending Company leased from Morris Raffkind a portion of a brick building located at 515 West 10th Street in Amarillo. The lease, evidenced by a written instrument, was for a primary term ending December 31, 1972. Defendant was granted the option to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Zeidman v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1961
- Forrest v. DurnellTexas Supreme Court · 1894
- Pickrell v. BucklerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Frankfurt v. DeckerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. KeahyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Interstate Fire Insurance Co. v. First Tape, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
- Digby v. HatleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978