Legal Opinion

United States v. Fensterwald

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 8, 1977No. 76-1290PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

The factual allegations of appellant Fensterwald here have taken him out of the *87class of the ordinary taxpayer, whose efforts at seeking discovery would, if allowed universally, obviously be too burdensome to the Internal Revenue Service. Cf. United States v. Wright Motor Company, Inc., 536 F.2d 1090 (5th Cir., 1976, McCree, J.). Fensterwald has alleged, and it is not contradicted, that he as an attorney represented James McCord, one of the original seven Watergate defendants, at the time McCord made his revelations to District Judge Sirica which contributed so greatly to the judicial,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Wright Motor Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jack Lavin and Robin LavinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  2. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Dresser Industries, Inc., United States, Intervenor. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Dresser Industries, Inc., Edward R. Luter, United States, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  3. United States of America and Robert F. Kelso, Jr., Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service v. Southern Tanks, Inc., and Billy D. Murray, PresidentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  4. Securities and Exchange Commission v. John P. McGoff Global Communications Corp., Sacramento Publishing Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Dresser Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API