Legal Opinion

Mudd v. Mudd

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided November 2, 1983No. 04-83-00335-CVPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CANTU, Justice.

Appellant and appellee were granted a divorce and judgment was entered on May 26, 1983. An appeal was timely perfected by • the deposit of cash in lieu of bond.

The trial court originally entered an order setting a lump sum supersedeas bond in the amount of $4,000,000.00. Not being able to obtain a bond in that amount, appellant filed a motion requesting the trial court to set the amount of a bond sufficient to supersede only a part of the judgment. This motion was denied. Appellant then filed in this Court a motion for leave to file a petition for writ of mandamus,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ammex Warehouse Company v. ArcherTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Harrington v. Young Men's Christian Ass'n of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Joy v. JoyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  4. Harrington v. Young Men's Christian Ass'n of Houston & Harris CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Texaco Inc. v. Pennzoil Company, State of Texas, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  2. Lovelace v. Sabine Consolidated, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  3. Lowe v. Monsanto Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1998
  4. FAULKNERUSA, LP v. Alaron Supply Co., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2009
  5. Man-Gas Transmission Co. v. Osborne Oil Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API