Mudd v. Mudd
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CANTU, Justice.
Appellant and appellee were granted a divorce and judgment was entered on May 26, 1983. An appeal was timely perfected by • the deposit of cash in lieu of bond.
The trial court originally entered an order setting a lump sum supersedeas bond in the amount of $4,000,000.00. Not being able to obtain a bond in that amount, appellant filed a motion requesting the trial court to set the amount of a bond sufficient to supersede only a part of the judgment. This motion was denied. Appellant then filed in this Court a motion for leave to file a petition for writ of mandamus,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ammex Warehouse Company v. ArcherTexas Supreme Court · 1964
- Harrington v. Young Men's Christian Ass'n of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1970
- Joy v. JoyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Harrington v. Young Men's Christian Ass'n of Houston & Harris CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
3Cited by10 opinions
- Texaco Inc. v. Pennzoil Company, State of Texas, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Lovelace v. Sabine Consolidated, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Lowe v. Monsanto Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1998
- FAULKNERUSA, LP v. Alaron Supply Co., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2009
- Man-Gas Transmission Co. v. Osborne Oil Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.