Legal Opinion

Andrew v. State

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 28, 1996No. 95-301PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Allen, C J.

In this appeal we consider whether the State is immune from a tort suit claiming damages for injuries resulting from an allegedly negligent inspection of a private workplace pursuant to the Vermont Occupational Safety and Health Act (VOSHA), 21 V.S.A §§ 201-264. We conclude that the State is immune from the suit because plaintiffs, an injured employee and his wife, have failed to show that a private analog exists for the State’s regulatory enforcement activities. Accordingly, we affirm the superior court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the State.

We view the facts as alleged…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Myers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  3. Blessing v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Sabia v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  5. Denis Bail Bonds, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Implant Recipients v. Dow Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  2. Kane v. LamotheSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  3. Kennery v. State of Vermont, Valcourt, LaBombard and Other Members of the Dept. of Public SafetySupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  4. Dalmer v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  5. Candido v. Polymers, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API