Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Richardson

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 8, 1992No. 1835PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Shaw, Judge:

Respondent-wife, Carolyn R. Richardson, brought a rule to show cause on November 6, 1989 asking that appellant-husband, Jesse J. Richardson and his mother, Annabelle Richardson, show cause why they had not complied with provisions of a divorce decree. The trial judge found the court had no jurisdiction over the husband’s mother since she was not a named party in the divorce action. The judge further refused to hold the husband in contempt, but ordered him to pay the wife lump-sum alimony of $75,000. The husband appeals.1 We affirm.

On July 23,1984, the parties were divorced by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Means v. MeansSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  2. Lynn v. LynnCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  3. Loftis v. LoftisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  4. Wingard v. WingardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Simpson v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API