Murray's Liquors, Inc. v. Alcoholic Beverages Control Commission
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtPerretta, J.
General Laws c. 138, § 34B, provides that a licensed seller of alcoholic beverages who reasonably relies upon a Massachusetts driver’s license as proof of sufficient age to purchase such beverages will be presumed to have exercised *101due care in mating the sale. Murray’s Liquors, Inc. (Murray’s), sold alcoholic beverages to four minors, three of whom presented false out-of-State drivers’ licenses as proof of their ages. On appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court affirming the decision of the Alcoholic Beverages Control Commission (commission) upholding the local licensing board’s (board)…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City Railroad v. TurnipseedSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Seagram Distillers Co. v. Alcoholic Beverages Control CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Worcester Main South, Inc. v. DelgadoMassachusetts Superior Court · 2002
- Grenier v. Town of ShrewsburyMassachusetts Superior Court · 2009