Legal Opinion

Murray's Liquors, Inc. v. Alcoholic Beverages Control Commission

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided October 19, 1999No. 97-P-1598PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPerretta, J.

General Laws c. 138, § 34B, provides that a licensed seller of alcoholic beverages who reasonably relies upon a Massachusetts driver’s license as proof of sufficient age to purchase such beverages will be presumed to have exercised *101due care in mating the sale. Murray’s Liquors, Inc. (Murray’s), sold alcoholic beverages to four minors, three of whom presented false out-of-State drivers’ licenses as proof of their ages. On appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court affirming the decision of the Alcoholic Beverages Control Commission (commission) upholding the local licensing board’s (board)…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City Railroad v. TurnipseedSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. Seagram Distillers Co. v. Alcoholic Beverages Control CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Worcester Main South, Inc. v. DelgadoMassachusetts Superior Court · 2002
  2. Grenier v. Town of ShrewsburyMassachusetts Superior Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API