Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sutton v. Adams

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 17, 1934No. 10166Published

1Dissent

Beck,- Presiding Justice, and Worrill, Judge,

dissenting.

We concur in the ruling of the majority that the writ of mandamus, and not injunction, would have been the proper remedy to enforce the plaintiff’s alleged right as a public official to have his name and salary placed upon the budget.

But we are of the opinion that under the facts alleged the petitioner showed that he had been ousted from the office to which he claims title. The mere fact that in his allegation he does not use the expression “had been ousted,” or had been deprived of the office, does not matter, inasmuch as the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Martin v. RowlandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API