Commonwealth v. Helser
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
JACOBS, President Judge:
This appeal follows appellant’s conviction and sentence in the court below on the charge of solicitation to commit murder. The issue we must decide is whether the court below erred in the way it handled a note passed to it from the jury during deliberations. 1 For the reasons that follow, we hold that the court should have questioned the jurors regarding the nature of the information received by them, and therefore grant appellant a new trial.
The evidence produced at trial reveals that sometime during 1976, appellant began discussing a plan to “beat up” Wilmer…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. StoltzfusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. HeinbaughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. BrunoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. StewartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. BobkoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Mitchell, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1993
- Commonwealth v. CasperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- State v. HunterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- State v. HunterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982