United States v. One Ford Coach Automobile
District Court, W.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL, District Judge.
The Morris Plan Bank has filed its petition for remission of forfeiture of a Ford automobile seized by officers of the government while engaged in transporting ardent spirits upon which the tax had not been paid. The petitioner asserts an interest in the automobile by virtue of a conditional contract of sale and bases its right to a remission of forfeiture on the provisions of U.S.C.A., title 27, § 40a, being section 204 of the Act of August 27, 1935, known as the Liquor Law Repeal and Enforcement Act. The facts are not in dispute, a jury has been waived, and all matters…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- J. W. Goldsmith, Jr.-Grant Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
3Cited by7 opinions
- Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
- United States v. One 1936 Studebaker Sedan, Engine No. D-74084, Serial No. 5850480District Court, W.D. Washington · 1937
- United States v. One 1936 Model Ford De Luxe Tudor AutomobileDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1938
- Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
- United States v. One 1939 Ford Coach AutomobileDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.