Legal Opinion

Straut v. Calissi

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided December 18, 1968No. Civ. A. 863-67PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before FORMAN, Circuit Judge, AUGELLI, Chief District Judge, and SHAW, District Judge. FORMAN, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs in this action seek a judgment declaring unconstitutional a New Jersey sedition statute, N.J.Rev.Stat. § 2 A:148-22. 1 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2281 and 2284 a three-judge court was convened to hear argument and pass upon the constitutional issues raised. On March 12, 1968, counsel filed with the court a stipulation of fact and several affidavits, upon which trial was to proceed. There being no material facts in dispute, no live testimony or other evidence was offered.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Shelton v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Long Island Vietnam Moratorium Committee v. CahnDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1970
  2. Anderson v. SillsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
  3. Avenues in Leather, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
  4. Long Island Vietnam Moratorium Committee v. CahnDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API