Legal Opinion

LaTulip v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 16, 1994No. 94-01927PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Bobby A. LaTulip appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Contrary to the trial court’s determination, we find LaTulip’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to impeach a state witness and failure to permit LaTulip to testify to be facially sufficient pursuant to Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). We, therefore, reverse on those issues only and remand for attachments or further proceedings.

In his timely filed motion, LaTulip claims trial counsel…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Gill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. OisorioDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. Steffa v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. Tarver v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  4. Wynn v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API